Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

ES

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC (ELST)·Q3 2014 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2014 deteriorated materially: revenue fell to $380,407 and ELST posted a net loss of $(93,806), or $(0.02) per share, versus $574,507 revenue and $0.01 EPS in Q3 2013; gross margin compressed and operating loss widened, driven by lower volumes and mix .
  • Sequentially, revenue declined from $532,262 in Q2 2014 to $380,407 and profitability reversed from $12,912 net income to a $(93,806) net loss, reflecting deleveraging of fixed costs and a less favorable mix .
  • Management attributed the downturn to decreased core product sales and continuing economic concerns in foreign markets; export sales dropped to 3% of revenue (vs. 17% a year ago), and two domestic customers accounted for 15.5% and 11.5% of quarterly sales, highlighting concentration risk .
  • Balance sheet remains debt-free with cash rising to $952,484 and current ratio improving to 61.4x; no dividend declared; no formal guidance issued .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Strengthened liquidity and no long-term debt: cash and equivalents increased to $952,484; current assets of $2,896,149 vs. current liabilities of $47,168 (61.4x current ratio); long-term debt: -0- .
  • Operating discipline on marketing: marketing expense decreased slightly YoY ($111,456 vs. $114,188) as management curtailed travel, though total OpEx rose on R&D and G&A .
  • Management investing for product roadmap: inventories increased partly to support new ESTeem 210 and 195 products; R&D up due to subcontracted engineering and payroll to support development .

Quote: “Management believes the decrease in quarterly and year to date sales revenues is due to decreased core products and continuing economic concerns in foreign markets.”

What Went Wrong

  • Topline weakness and deleverage: revenue declined 33.8% YoY and 28.5% QoQ; operating swung to a $(98,956) loss (vs. $59,254 profit in Q3 2013 and $10,835 profit in Q2 2014) as fixed costs were not leveraged .
  • Margin pressure: cost of sales percentage increased versus prior periods; management cited product mix and unleveraged manufacturing overhead; gross profit fell to $190,280 from $319,333 a year ago .
  • Export weakness and concentration risk: export sales were just 3% of net revenue vs. 17% last year; two domestic customers comprised 15.5% and 11.5% of sales; backlog remained small at ~$12,274 .

Financial Results

Note: Minor rounding differences exist between the 8-K press release and 10-Q (e.g., sales $380,408 vs. $380,407; net loss $(93,804) vs. $(93,806)). Calculations below use 10-Q amounts .

MetricQ3 2013Q2 2014Q3 2014
Revenue (Sales + Site Support) ($)$574,507 $532,262 $380,407
Gross Profit ($)$319,333 $302,276 $190,280
Operating Income (Loss) ($)$59,254 $10,835 $(98,956)
Net Income (Loss) ($)$51,956 $12,912 $(93,806)
EPS (Basic/Diluted) ($)$0.01 Nil ($0.00) $(0.02)
Gross Margin (%)55.6% (calc) 56.8% (calc) 50.0% (calc)
Operating Margin (%)10.3% (calc) 2.0% (calc) (26.0%) (calc)
Cost of Sales % (Mgmt view)41% 39% 47%

Change vs. prior periods (Q3 2014 reference):

  • Vs Q3 2013: Revenue −33.8%; Gross Profit −40.4%; Operating Income −$158,210; EPS −$0.03 (calc; sources above) .
  • Vs Q2 2014: Revenue −28.5%; Gross Profit −37.1%; Operating Income −$109,791; EPS −$0.02 (calc; sources above) .

Segment revenue mix (Domestic/Foreign):

SegmentQ3 2013Q2 2014Q3 2014
Domestic Revenue ($)$479,644 $434,192 $367,657
Foreign Revenue ($)$94,863 $98,070 $12,750
Domestic Mix (%)83% 82% 97%
Foreign Mix (%)17% 18% 3%

KPIs and balance sheet/liquidity:

KPIQ1 2014Q2 2014Q3 2014
Backlog ($)$27,873 $14,895 $12,274
Cash & Equivalents ($)$681,952 $880,715 $952,484
Current Ratio (x)57.8x 51.6x 61.4x
Long-term Debt-0- -0- -0-
Inventory ($)$720,664 $706,403 $715,650
Top Customer ConcentrationTwo customers = 21.6% (10.8%/10.8%) None >10% Two customers = 27.0% (15.5%/11.5%)

Guidance Changes

No formal financial guidance was provided. No dividends declared in 2014.

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueFY/Q4 2014NoneNoneMaintained (no guidance)
MarginsFY/Q4 2014NoneNoneMaintained (no guidance)
OpExFY/Q4 2014NoneNoneMaintained (no guidance)
OI&EFY/Q4 2014NoneNoneMaintained (no guidance)
Tax rateFY/Q4 2014NoneNoneMaintained (no guidance)
DividendFY 2014NoneNoneMaintained (no dividend)

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

No Q3 2014 earnings call transcript was available; themes below reflect MD&A and press release commentary.

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2014)Previous Mentions (Q2 2014)Current Period (Q3 2014)Trend
Foreign demand (Latin America/EMEA)Export 19%; weakness in Latin America cited Export 18%; YoY decline; Hungary/Peru mix Export 3%; YoY decline; Mexico/Peru mix; economic concerns Deteriorating
Product mix/marginsCOS 41% (GM ~59%); mix effects COS 39% (GM ~61%); favorable mix COS 47%; unleveraged overhead; mix headwinds Worsening
Domestic end-marketsIndustrial automation demand improvement Water/wastewater, mining strength cited Decreased domestic sales cited as driver of decline Softening
R&D and engineering servicesR&D up modestly; product development Engineering services and core products drove growth R&D up on subcontracted engineering/payroll Continuing investment
Backlog/ordering pattern~$27.9K; “as needed” ordering ~$14.9K; “as needed” ordering ~$12.3K; “as needed” ordering Low/declining
Internal controlsMaterial weakness (segregation of duties) Material weakness persists Material weakness persists Unchanged

Management Commentary

  • “Management believes the decrease in quarterly and year to date sales revenues is due to decreased core products and continuing economic concerns in foreign markets.”
  • “During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Company had $12,750 in foreign export sales… compared with $94,863 for the same quarter of 2013.”
  • “Cost of sales percentage for the third quarter of 2014 and 2013 was 47% and 41%, respectively. The cost of sales increase… is the result of the product mix… and manufacturing overhead that was not leveraged.”
  • “Research and Development expenses increased $16,684… due to increased subcontracted engineering expertise and payroll.”
  • “The Corporation had a sales order backlog of approximately $12,274 as of September 30, 2014… customers generally place orders on an ‘as needed basis.’”

Q&A Highlights

No earnings call/Q&A was available for Q3 2014; no management Q&A clarifications disclosed in filings or press release .

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus estimates from S&P Global for ELST were unavailable for Q3 2014 (no mapping/coverage). As a result, we cannot provide vs-consensus comparisons for revenue or EPS this quarter.
  • Given the lack of coverage and microcap status, estimates are unlikely to anchor near-term trading; investors should focus on order trends, mix, and domestic end-market recovery (see Financial Results and Themes) .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Volume and mix drove a sharp earnings reversal: revenue down 28.5% QoQ and 33.8% YoY with gross margin contraction to ~50%, yielding a $(0.02) loss; sustained recovery requires rebuilding volume and mix quality .
  • Export markets were a notable drag (3% of sales vs. 17% LY) amid macro softness; focus shifts to domestic pipeline and timing of project-based orders .
  • Fixed-cost deleverage was evident: operating loss of $(98,956) on $289,237 OpEx; near-term profitability hinges on volume/mix and OpEx control .
  • Liquidity is solid and debt-free, providing flexibility through a downturn; cash rose to $952,484 and current ratio to 61.4x, though backlog is modest ($12,274) .
  • Watch product transition and R&D spend tied to ESTeem 210/195; success could improve mix and margins, but costs must be monitored .
  • Internal control material weakness remains (segregation of duties); not cash-impacting but a governance overhang to monitor .
  • Without Street estimates, catalysts will be order wins, customer concentration risk (two customers = 27% of Q3 sales), and any stabilization in export demand .